|
Comments
|
|
Great.
|
|
Hope Schlais on
4/15/2009
Always comment as to performance scenario. Give a helpful performance tip.
|
|
Carla Wilson on
4/15/2009
I really like the idea of not only using a "view" with parameters, but also creating it dynamically inline. Very cool. I have to see what I can use it for right away.
|
|
Carla Wilson on
4/15/2009
Question: Is the Inline UDF available in SQL 2000, or just 2005+? This could be a work-around for not having CTEs in 2000.
|
|
|
Yes, Inline UDFs are available in SQL Server 2000.
|
|
|
I wish you could have spoken about SYSTEM Defined functions too.
|
|
|
What are the performance differences between UDFs and views?
|
|
|
love it
|
|
|
good
|
|
|
Little more explanation on topic
|
|
|
Functions can return a variable rather than a table. The author stated that they only return tables.
|
|
|
Hi. That's inline functions and multi-statement functions return tables. Scalar functions return single values that can be assigned to a variable. There's a different video on them here:
http://www.sqlshare.com/what-is-a-scalar-udf_606.aspx?searchid=129732
HTH
Andy
|
|
|
Excellent Stuff
|
|
Shaun Turner on
7/13/2011
My biggest concern with these is that you're explaining the differences between views and UDF's at the highest level only. You don't talk about how creating these shortcuts to code like this can either help or hinder performance of your queries if done (in)correctly.
|
|
|
Sometimes you just like to freshen up with the simple things every now and then. Thanks!
|
|
|
Thanks. Very good and informative example.
|
|
|
Nice work. I Appreciated, Thank you.
-Domingo Asuncion
|
|
|
Good video!
|
|
|
Would be better to spend a little more time on the function definition. maybe a couple of extra examples
|
|
|
excellent tip
|
|
Maurice Ivory on
2/16/2012
I need to watch this over again....
|