|
Comments
|
|
Very Informative Thanx
|
|
|
Good presentation of the execution plan, knowing that you have issues with a particular scan or filter can be useful. I would like to have a future presentation that gives hints on how to resolve the time consuming parts of a query base on the report of the execution plan.
|
|
|
video explained something that is very obvious to anyone.
|
|
|
Could use more detail on the meaning behind the cost. Why a number like 0.3475678? How is it dervied?
|
|
|
I'm glad a few people found it useful. The numbers are derived from the cost estimates used by the optimizer based on statistics. These are a general estimate, measured in terms of seconds, based on an old machine that was on someone's desk at Microsoft back in the '90's (or so the story goes). They're not accurate measurements of reality, but they do show how the optimizer arrived at its decisions.
|
|
|
good one
|
|
|
I would like a presentation on how to interpret the query plan shown and then optimize the query based on that
|
|
|
I've already seen this one. Do you send out repeats in the daily email?
|
|
|
Thanks, Grant. Your short videos are very helpful for someone like me who is just starting to learn how to use and interpret execution plans.
|
|
|
While I appreciate execution time analysis, I think it would be more useful to compare two queries having different estimated times yet which return the same data.
|
|
|
But the same query can have different estimates as the underlying statistics change. That's why relying on estimated values is quite frankly dangerous.
|
|
|
Thank you.
|
|
|
good one
|
|
|
Not being aware of this functionality, I have been doing comparisons the hard way. This will save a lot of time. Thanks!
|
|
|
Could have loved to listen query optimization
|
|
|
can be more elaborate with some more examples
|
|
|
Ok Video
|
|
|
Good video with clear voice
|
|
|
thanks
|
|
|
Very Basic, was expecting much more
|
|
|
:)
|
|
|
more of the optimizer would be great
|